And it’s your place to be her lover and her strength, not her ‘girlfriend’.
And mating in humans is no different than mating in other animals: there is a good and bad side for both participants. I’m not sure De Angelo has any numbers or research to back up his claims. But some of what David De Angelo purports is not far from the mark.
He says most men lack a deep understanding of women – something women appreciate for its honesty and its insistence that women’s opinions do matter.
Why should guys take advice in seducing women from an otherwise attractive guy? He also, in his “Double Your Dating” programs, teaches that men attract women because of behavior. He has developed a number of “new” methods and techniques for seducing women and hopefully enhancing their attraction “regardless of the man’s appearance.” According to his bio, David De Angelo bases his methods on “human psychology” (as opposed to mineral psychology? He also bases them on “how women are genetically programmed (through evolution) to respond to men”.
Here’s part of David De Angelo’s magic: He can convince so men that his twists and alterations on Ross Jeffries’ old techniques are worth plunking down cash for. David De Angelo’s most popular information is meted out in a series of books, DVDs, concert-like appearances, and other venues with variations on the title and theme of “Doubling Your Dating”.
This echo of the masculinists of the 1970s is something not many people can argue with.
No one is trying to tell you to run your life in conflict with who you are.
De Angelo is suggesting that a woman does not freely ‘choose’ who she is attracted to, but can be influenced by all sorts of outside sources.
The key is to control those things which are in your control and aim them at the woman in such a way as to force her to be attracted to you. This is a direct shot at some of the weaker facets of the Mystery Method.
But on closer inspection it reveals another shadowy area of De Angelo’s seduction method. The woman’s feelings are but mirrors of your own posturing.
And therefore she cannot be convinced, through word or action, but must only reflect your own intentions.
He redefines the nature of the male-female intimate relationship by suggesting that it’s not a friendship at all.